European cup (e.g. soccer)
Reason for England's win over Denmark revealed! Fans speak out for a second time, this time telling the truth. Netizens' hot takes hit the nail on the head: Sterling is the
England Premier Soccer League
Wu Lei (1979-), Chinese footballer
, the run was world class, the shot was another story. Kane was really good, froze and turned the penalty into a general goal. One-sided Sterling had the idea of diving, objectively Denmark's number five did put his right foot out in front of Sterling to block, the vitals also did not poke the ball. In fact, this penalty kick no problem ah, who let you stretch out that foot, kick amateur ball know, the penalty area foul 90% will be a penalty kick, not to mention this kind of work competition, this is the experience, know that happy Lin shot not into, let him go in to shoot ah. In fact, looking at the whole game, Denmark in addition to that goal there is not much time, the beginning of the second half of the obvious physical decline is too serious, can not run, if it is not small Schmeichel brave, would have been spent. This penalty was awarded no problem, have the patience of Denmark also go to create a that is, Sterling feet fast, there is aggression in the penalty area has physical contact fall to the penalty kicks no problem at all! OT after Denmark brawn can not, the score is behind the abandonment of the attack. Looking forward to Denmark next year
World Cup
The performance, loved the Danish team, great energy.
Next up in the final it's home field advantage again, but I wonder if we'll lose the title like France did. UEFA will let Italy or England win this year? Denmark has been promoted to the semi-finals, but they don't have the strength for the final. If Denmark's strength were to make it to the final, it would be called a guaranteed win for Italy. England side of the road into a few times, the middle did not have a parcel grab point, even if the launch of a forward motion are not, England alone win is estimated to be too hot, must be overtime. Looking ahead to the final, I guess Italy may not lose in the strength is not good, on the level of England, kick Italy really can not win, but sorry Italy's left back Spina Zola injured, now Italy's left attack is basically wasted. In the course of the competition, there are two balls in the field, and the referee's point of view seems to be able to see, at this time should be blown to stop the competition is right. Secondly this ball can not be said that Sterling diving, at least is not the full meaning of the fake fall, the defense player obviously have kicked Sterling. But such an important competition, seems to be not enough to the norms of penalty kicks. At this point the video referee intervened, but the referee insisted on his own penalty, which are not fault.
The video referee merely assists, it's still the referee who makes the decision, so is it possible that the video referee reminds the referee that the penalty should be canceled? Or do we have to go to the sidelines to watch the replay? There is no such reason, the referee does not have the right to insist on his own judgment? Even if it was wrong. The penalty was a callable one, and it's reasonable to call it and not call it. Did you fall down in the penalty area? He fell down. Was there any physical contact that caused the loss of balance? There was physical contact. The referee awarded the penalty in the first moment, and the video referee also recognized the penalty, what's wrong with awarding the penalty? If you don't want to be awarded a penalty, don't move people's feet, England has at least 10 times to make progress in the penalty area with physical contact, if you don't move people's feet, they won't use the rules reasonably. Sterling this ball does have physical contact, but also slightly touched, if in the
Manchester United Football Club
I don't even have to look at the VR to call it, so it's just a normal operation this time. Denmark if there is still Eriksen in, maybe not the same. Denmark is indeed tough and deserves admiration, sorry the Danish fairytale didn't play out again. It wasn't a convincing win, but it was England's best performance. England clearly could have scored another goal or two at the end, telling us that it was strength that won the game.
As a result they were backpedaling and we were all obsessed with penalties after the game, poor Sterling. I have to say, Sterling was able to break through like that in extra time, which is very strong in itself. This year, England's style of play is relatively conservative, and the win is also conservative. But looking back at the last few
European cup (e.g. soccer)
Champions, all of these types of teams won the title, stuttered their way to the final and won the title. What a Danish fairy tale, Greek mythology, Portugal flat in the end. Denmark played really well, there was some controversy over the penalty, if not for this penalty, England would not necessarily be in the final. Now England deserves success, just this penalty is controversial, Denmark last promotion controversial more. When Lampard scored and said he didn't score, England can only suffer a loss? Denmark is poor in the individual ability of the players, there is no special outstanding players to finish the game. Denmark was restricted all over the field and had very little time. England's strength this year is very strong ah, waiters and the main simply can not be distinguished. I don't think you know anything about soccer, but if you say that England doesn't deserve to win, or that Denmark lost unfairly, I think you don't know anything about soccer. Now the competition time before the extra time are waste time, into the extra time will be divided into winners and losers, if most people buy extra time, that penalty kicks before the waste time.
Thank you for always valuing me, and thank you for being there for me on the road to creation, and I will continue to do so!
