It might be a bit inappropriate to say that you pay, but it's a special coincidence to say that it happened.
This year, the Football Association publicly recognized two matches in the Chinese Super League in which refereeing errors led to goal disallowances. One was the match between Nantong Zhiyun and Dalian Ren. Nantong Zhiyun's Guihong's goal was ruled offside, but slow-motion footage showed that Guihong was not in midfield at the start of the match, so he was not offside at all. The FA officially apologized to Nantong Zhiyun.
The other match was between Qingdao Hainiu and Chengdu Rongcheng. In the last minute, Ickerson's draw was blown away and worried about a handball foul by Riccios. After the match, a video proved that he was worried that Riccios K had not handballed at all. The goal was misjudged and the FA apologized to Chengdu Rongcheng.
Coincidentally, after two misjudgments, the next round opponents of Nantong Zhiyun and Chengdu Rongcheng are both Shandong Taishan.
Let's take a look at both games:
The final result of the match between Nantong Zhiyun and Shandong Taishan was 1:1.15 minutes into the match, Shandong Taishan's Jia Desong was given a red card. Jia Desong's foul was a competition between Guihong and Jia Desong. In slow motion, Guihong was slightly ahead of the game, but did not develop a clear advantage. In the confrontation, Guihong and Jadesson had mutual behavior, which was the reason why Taishan fans went wild in protest after Jadesson was shown the red card.
In the post-match press conference, Choi Kang-hee also expressed his dissatisfaction in his own way. He was silent for a few seconds before saying, "What should I say? I am not a robot. I am a foreign coach. After every game, I apologized for the players. I am embarrassed for the players."
Chengdu Rongcheng defeated Shandong Taishan on the road. First of all, Shandong Taishan played poorly, but the referee was also controversial, i.e., the handball penalty by Kim Oba. The controversy was not whether it was a penalty or not, but the timing of the whistle.
Obviously, the right to the ball remains with Tarzan and poses a threat to the goal. Why not play first according to the principle of favoring the offense? Furthermore, it was still clear that the ball was in Taishan's possession before the whistle was blown. Why was the right to the ball awarded to Chengdu after the restart and a free kick sent in the backfield? Is this Tarzan's rule? How does this blowing and self-canceling penalty affect Tarzan?
In addition, after Fellaini stops the ball on this attack, the defense across from him is practically lined up and lacks protection from other positions. The attack was quite promising. As a result, he was smothered by the referee.
Xu Liang always says that it was a good chance and the possession was Taishan's, but it ended up giving the opponent a goal kick.
Referee McMahon yelled after the fight and felt relieved. Other than that call, I think the whole game was judged on a different scale. Chengdu blew the foul at the first touch. Taishan being pulled is normal. The most direct result of affecting the players' emotions is player impatience.
