Against the Qingdao Sea Bulls, Chengdu Chengdu last minute "tie ball" is the first attacking handball, if it is a handball, whether the goal is invalid, these two points have become the focus of controversy after the game. According to reports, after the game Chengdu Chengdu has complained to the Football Association, the Association has not yet given a clear response.
Was it the first handball by Chengdu's Palacios before Iverson's goal? The FA did not respond, and some good people sent a slow-motion video of the so-called "handball foul" to former Chinese Super League foreign referee Clattenburg, who watched the video and clearly stated that it was not a handball and that the attacking goal should have been valid (photo below).
In other words, the "Blind Monk" thought that Ickxon's goal should have been valid and the final result should have been 3-3 instead of 2-3 for Chengdu, but the matter is not over yet! Someone posted a clearer video on the internet, showing that Chengdu's foreign aid player Palacios' hand didn't touch the ball at all (below), let alone commit a handball foul.
Even more interesting! When Palacios was fighting for the ball with Qingdao Hainiu No. 8 Ma Xingyu, the latter's hand seemed to have inadvertently touched the ball (below). Here's a big reversal!
The plot was reversed and fans were talking about it in the comment section (below)! Some said that even if it was authorized by Qingdao Hainiu players, it was not intentional. Some said it was just a case of not giving Chengdu Rongcheng a penalty and blowing away someone else's goal. Some fans thought a classic Jedi comeback match was ruined by three amateur referees. Some fans also shouted for Chengdu Rongcheng, saying that it turned out to be a handball by the defending team, not the attacking team.
Originally, we thought that as the domestic first-class referee Manning, sitting in the VAR "small dark room", the best business ability referee to check the VAR video, certainly not wrong. Surprisingly, even the "Golden Whistle" of the Chinese Super League was also seen, only to treat the good ball as an invalid goal.
As it turns out, the replay of the play is blurry and Palacios' hands are close to his body. Even if the ball had hit him and scraped his own hand in passing, it wouldn't have affected the direction of the ball. There was no need to blow the goal.
However, I was afraid of Manning's "serious" spirit - I saw the referee raise his flag to indicate a handball, assumed that it was probably an offensive handball, and then searched for clues from the video bit by bit. In the end, based on the principle of "I'd rather be wrong by 1,000 than miss a good goal", I just decided to nullify the penalty in the case of blurred video.
One of the most taboo situations for referees in the game is that the subjective determination of the component is greater than the objective judgment, there is no uniform standard of judgment, but according to their own preferences. For example, some referees for the same foul behavior, some teams do not have a license, some teams to the card; some actions according to the standard to the red card, some relegation only to the yellow card. This time, even the "Golden Whistle" of the Chinese Super League is not counted. Should the FA suspend the player? No wonder this level of professionalism can not play in the World Cup, only on the sidelines playing cards.
