The team was drawn at home by the bottom of the table and lost 2 points. After the game, Hong Kong fans shouted "Javier is out", and some journalists from the Hong Kong team criticized the referee for unfair enforcement. Journalist Liu Wenchao pointed out on his personal social media platform that Hong Kong suffered four major "losses": a body hair offside, a handball in the penalty area, a foul on Oscar before conceding the goal, and a red card counterattack that had to be intervened by Var (pictured below).
The "offside" referred to by the reporter was the second offside goal that was blown to Hong Kong in the 11th minute of the match. The offside moment was also shown on the live broadcast (below). From this line, the width of the Hong Kong player's offside was about the size of a position, which is not strictly speaking an "offside of body hair".
Counting the handball in the Dalian Ren's penalty area, the goal can be judged or not. It can be judged because Wu Lei's shot did hit the defender's hand and the latter's arm was not fully contracted. If Manning had enforced the law, the ball would likely have been blown for a penalty kick.
If you don't judge penalty kicks, you won't judge them. It's simple:The two sides were so close that the defending player simply didn't have time to stop. What's more, Wu Wei did stop on defense, his arms were relatively natural, and it's not a stretch to intentionally reach out to stop a shot (below).
Many players profit from penalties by deliberately aiming to kick a soccer ball at a defender's arm in the penalty area. If a penalty is awarded for every hit on the arm, it will undoubtedly contribute to this bad trend, just like fake wrestling. Some referees will definitely award penalties, and some referees won't necessarily award penalties. If you are judged, you have nothing to say. If you don't judge, there are rules that explain it.
Look at the Dallians' goal. Was it a foul? The goal was scored when Oscar "passed" the ball to a Dalian player before he fell to the ground and the visitors launched a quick counterattack.
Take a closer look at Oscar's landing (above). Mr. Dalian player stopped him with his right leg. After his opponent dropped his leg, Oscar tried to move forward with the ball. At this point, Zhao Jianan kicked the ball first and tried to destroy him. As a result, the ball kicked Oscar's right foot. When he leaned forward, he fell to the ground unsteadily.
Is this foul play? Not obviously! You can't say you made physical contact. If you're on the ground, you're going to foul. If Zhao Jianan had not kicked the ball the second time, but Oscar's foot, it would have been a foul, but people kicked the ball first and didn't meet Oscar.
As for Laureus, the red card was only given after a reminder from the VAR video assistant referee, and Liu Ji groaned a bit. Mind you, the referee certainly didn't see that Laureus was using his hands rather than his feet to clear the ball. This can only be reviewed via VAR. Is there a problem? Is this a loss for the port as well?
After talking about the four major "losses," the reporter went on to write, "While I sometimes laugh at the ridiculous behavior of some fans, maybe the real crybaby gets the milk." It wasn't clear, but everyone could tell which teams' fans he was referring to.
It must be said that at this point in time, Hong Kong fans have a deeper understanding of the true feelings of other fans. When Beijing Guoan fans were yelling about "offside body hair", and when Shandong Taishan fans were yelling about Fellaini's good shot being blown for a "foul", what did Hong Kong fans say about others?
