About Chinese Super League
Clarification of the status of some controversial penalties in the 10th round of the League
2021 Season Chinese Super League
In the 10th round of the league, some of the matches showed controversial penalties, which aroused great attention from the media and fans. After the match, the Referee Department of the Preparatory Group of the CFL timely arranged a panel of experts to comment on the controversial penalties of this round of matches. Based on the principle of fairness, equity and disclosure, the following is the status of some of the controversial penalties that have attracted more attention from the public:
Controversy 1: July 31, Shanghai Seaport and Shanghai Shenhua
In the 73rd minute of the match, the referee penalized Shanghai Seaport's No. 20 player for a handball foul in front of the penalty area with the opponent's No. 15 player in the process of scrambling by Shanghai Shenhua.
Kicked a free kick in front of the field to recover the competition, the free kick was blocked by the wall, then Shanghai Shenhua
No.10 player crosses the ball to Shanghai Shenhua
Player #2 shoots the ball off the goal line and the assistant referee raises his flag to indicate that the referee has called an offside foul.
Comment: No foul by Shanghai Harbor No.20, Shanghai Shenhua
Handball foul committed by player No.15, the clinical referee wrongly awarded a handball foul. Shanghai Shenhua
Player 2 does not constitute an offside foul, the assistant referee implies a fault and the referee is correct in choosing to delay the whistle.
Controversy 2: Shanghai Harbor and Shanghai Shenhua
In the 88th minute of the match, in the Shanghai Harbor penalty area, Shanghai Shenhua
No.14 player and Shanghai Harbour No.2 player jumped up to fight for the ball in the air, both players had touch, then the ball rebounded to Shanghai Shenhua
No.15 player in front of the player, No.15 player shoots to score, the referee penalizes No.14 player for a foul, canceling the goal, the referee communicates with the VAR, the VAR supports the referee's decision, and Shanghai Seaport kicks a direct free kick to recover the competition.
Comments Off on Shanghai Shenhua
No foul on the 14th player, the goal worked, the referee's decision to call the penalty on the spot was faulty, and the VAR was not operated properly.
Controversy 3: July 31, Dalian People and Beijing Guoan
With 90+5 minutes to go in the contest, Beijing Guoan
No.15 player pulled Dalian No.4 with his right hand while fighting for the ball with Dalian No.4 player, the referee whistled for a foul, Beijing Guoan
Player 15 kicked the ball out of bounds and the ball touched the leg of the Dalian Ren team official (head coach), the referee showed a yellow card to player 15 for warning, and Dalian Ren kicked a direct free kick to recover the match.
Comments Off on Beijing Guoan
No. 15 player in a short period of time to commit two yellow card warning foul behavior, can be 1 +1 red card penalty order out of the game, the referee clinical omission of the 2nd yellow card warning. At the same time, the review and analysis that, according to the video revealed that Beijing Guoan
Player 15 kicked the ball away after the referee's whistle with the intention of delaying the moment of the opponent's serve and without the subjective intention of using the ball as something to attack an official of the opposing team.
The refereeing work of the CFF preparation team has always insisted on fairness, equity and disclosure as the basic guideline. We would like to thank the media and fans for their attention to the refereeing work and their timely criticisms and corrections. To the Chinese Super League
We apologize for the impact that the misjudgments in some of the matches in the 10th round have brought to the fans and salons. In the future work, we will seriously summarize, constantly learn, and try our best to improve the referee's enforcement level, and do our best for the stable and healthy development of the professional league.
