It was proved that Dai Weijun's sharp breakthrough at that time was not only not appreciated by Li Tie, but also suppressed. It is perhaps evident that Li Tie's views are highly consistent with those of Donglu. He believed that Dai Weijun was wrong to go forward with the ball and Yu Dabao's protective reaction was correct. Therefore, it is easy to understand why Chinese soccer cannot break out of Asia, because everyone is wrong, and this wrong thinking is refuted by insiders.
Therefore, it is clear that this detail shows that Yu Dabao, who did not perform well in the game, should be the target that Li Tie abandoned. Dai Weijun, who received the ball aggressively and showed desire to attack in the game, should have been reused, but Dai Weijun was discarded. There is no doubt that Li Tie's employment was again pushed to the forefront by outsiders. If Dong Lu did not support Yu Dabao's protective response this time, perhaps fans had already pointed the employment issue at Li Tie at that time. Obviously, Dong Lu solved Li Tie's siege.
However, Milu, including former Chinese men's soccer coach Milu, also admitted that as a striker, he should appear closer to the goal rather than further away. Obviously, Milu's point of view is also refuting Dong Lu, which reconfirms Li Tie's suppression of Dai Weijun. Therefore, so many soccer experts at home and abroad agreed that Yu Dabao's running position at that time was problematic, but Dong Lu kept defending Li Tie. It's really scary when you think about it. After Li Tie was investigated, it was chilling to think at first that these details were linked. Chinese soccer's world qualifying tournament, held every four years, could be personally destroyed.
