In Beijing on March 15, journalist Zhao Yu provided an in-depth analysis of Feng Xiaoting's lengthy content posted on social media platforms. He argued that the level of soccer skills is not directly linked to the salary level, and that the Chinese
soccer ball
of the problem is actually a simple complication.
Zhao Yu's views are as follows:
For Feng Xiaoting's article, outside speculation about its authorship is not critical. No matter who wrote it, as long as it is posted on a personal microblog, it reflects its true thoughts.
There is almost no presence of exclamation points in the article, which is refreshing, as too many exclamation points often imply underdeveloped content. Also, too many parentheses in the article seem redundant and direct expressions are sufficient. The penultimate paragraph could be deleted as it is not appropriate in this type of analytical essay. Of course, freedom of expression is everyone's right and there is no harm in keeping it.
Feng Xiaoting's article reveals his emotions about China's
soccer ball
reflections on the current state of the game, which are valuable. Soccer needs more authentic voices, especially from those in the industry. Unfortunately, due to a variety of complications, many choose to remain silent or are afraid to speak up. On the Internet, it's not hard to understand all of this.
Over the years, the phenomenon of Chinese players' salaries being disproportionate to the level of soccer has been repeatedly criticized, summed up in one sentence: why do they get so much money for playing poorly?
It is true that during the peak period of investment in soccer, the salaries of players were indeed very high and not commensurate with their actual value. But this is also determined by the market, and a market in an abnormal state often leads to a mismatch of resources.
Now that the market has returned to rationality, players' salary levels are no longer as high as they used to be, and there are even cases of salary arrears and non-payment. The problem of salary arrears has lasted for a year, even losing to an opponent like Vietnam.
In fact, the improvement of the standard of soccer is not directly related to the salary. If you are just complaining about the phenomenon of "getting paid a lot of money but not getting results", there is nothing wrong with that, everyone has the right to criticize, and it has nothing to do with good or bad results.
If we are to find a solution to the problem, we cannot just take the salary level and the standard of soccer as the main contradiction and then simply think that lowering the salary will raise the standard. If this is really the case, will the development of soccer not be too easy?
The way to improve soccer is actually very simple and clear to everyone, but China
soccer ball
Years of always complicating simple issues have led to today's situation. Sometimes there is a sense of sadness, but also a sense of powerlessness.
