The League is still in its infancy, but like a wave of waves, a wave of replacement coaches has emerged. When the Foshan Southern Lions announced the news of Antoniqi's departure, Shijiazhuang Kung Fu, Guangxi Pingguo Ha Loud and clear, Liaoning Ironman and Jiangxi Lushan and other five teams have been declared to change the manager. Pingguo Ha Loud and clear although has begun to start the process of changing the coach, but has not yet been finalized the new coach candidate. In contrast, Liaoning Ironman and Jiangxi Lushan have quickly completed the appointment of a new manager, with the intention of helping the team get out of trouble through management changes.
Five coaches have been fired after just seven rounds of play, a phenomenon that reveals the fragility of the coaching scene in the Central League. However, this wave of coaching changes does not seem to be abating. Wuxi Wuhu, who are currently at the bottom of the table, have suffered five consecutive defeats after losing 1-2 to Guangzhou on the road. If the losing streak can't be reversed, Wuxi Wuhu may be the next team in the Central League to face a change of manager.
As a second-tier league in China, league results are often the primary consideration in the evaluation of coaches. When a team is in the doldrums, changing coaches is often seen as an effective means to quickly boost morale and improve the situation. But can frequent coaching changes really achieve the desired results, or are they just stopgap measures rather than fundamental solutions? This is a serious test for the club in the decision-making. After all, the development and progress of soccer can not be separated from a stable, scientific coaching team construction and long-term strategic planning. Simple and rough way to change the manager, and can not bring real change.
