Klinsmann is clearly the better man when considering his career and experience in coaching top clubs such as the German national team, Bayern Munich and Hertha Berlin, with a remarkable resume that far surpasses that of Ivanovic. What's even more appealing is that Klinsmann's annual salary for coaching the South Korean national team is only 2.1 million euros, a price that is undoubtedly acceptable to the CFA.
Even though Ivanovic's offer is cheaper, Klinsmann is undoubtedly the better choice in terms of value for money, promotion of change in the team and adjustment of technical style. Especially at this critical moment, even if the CFA ultimately fails to bring him into the fold, his reputation and influence alone will be able to restrain Ivanovic's confident candidate to a certain extent, which will be of great benefit to the CFA's work in selecting a new head coach. So, in your opinion, should the Chinese men's soccer team choose Ivanovic or Klinsmann?
