Dai Weijun's rapid breakthrough at the time, but Li Tie cold, and even encountered suppression. Li Tie and Donglu insights are surprisingly consistent, as Dai Weijun with the ball forward as a fallacy, but think Yu Dabao's defense reaction is appropriate. In this way, the plight of Chinese soccer is difficult to break through the barrier of Asia is obvious, because the wrong ideas are pervasive, and even the industry has also refuted.
Thus, Yu Dabao's poor performance on the field may be the reason why Li Tie abandoned him. In contrast, although Dai Weijun in the game actively stealing, show offensive desire, but was cold. Li Tie's decision once again sparked controversy, and had it not been for Dong Lu's support of Yu Dabao's defensive behavior, Li Tie might have become a target. Obviously, Dong Lu successfully resolved Li Tie's dilemma.
Interestingly, even former China national team coach Milu agrees that as a striker, he deserves to be near the goal, not away from it. This view of Milu is undoubtedly a rebuttal to Dong Lu, further confirming Li Tie's suppression of Dai Weijun. Numerous domestic and international soccer experts pointed out that Yu Dabao's running position at that time was problematic, but Dong Lu defended Li Tie. On second thought, the connection of these details after Li Tie was investigated is chilling. Chinese soccer's world preliminaries every four years may be damaged by such personal decisions.
