As night fell on February 18, soccer journalist Li Xuan unveiled a series of controversial topics about the national soccer team in her social sphere, a series of events like a wave of surging waves, from the salary restrictions of the Guangzhou team to Artemisia Junmin's salary claims to the Wuhan team's name change controversy.
Li Xuan pointed out sharply: Whether it is Evergrande's internal pay cuts, or captain Artemisia Junmin's payroll action on microblogging, as well as Wuhan's later "self-payroll" initiative, it all indicates that the professional football league is falling into a kind of out-of-control and absurd situation. From one end of the spectrum to the other, the rights and interests of players are being ruthlessly ignored.
Although the national football team in the loss to Vietnam, some people jokingly said "this gives more", but as a professional manager, the National Football Association should understand that such behavior is trampling on the dignity of the profession. Evergrande's initiative and Zhuoer's follow, the future may trigger a chain effect, more worrying.
So where is the NFA's action?
Li Xuan then turned to the topic of neutral names for clubs, emphasizing that if one were to read the overall plan for the change of the national football team in detail, one would find that the statement on neutral names is full of deep meaning and logical relationships, as follows:
"Optimize the equity structure of clubs. Implement multiple investments by the government, enterprises and individuals, encourage the governments where the clubs are located to invest in shares with resources such as soccer stadiums, form a reasonable structure of investment sources, promote the realization of the regionalization of clubs, and encourage clubs with the conditions to gradually realize the non-corporate nature of their names. Improve the club's corporate management structure, accelerate the construction of modern enterprise system, based on the long-term, systematic planning, and strive to build a century-old club."
Optimizing the shareholding structure and implementing diversified investment are the prerequisites for promoting the realization of the territorialization of clubs, which, in turn, is a condition for the non-corporatization of the club's name. However, how does the National Football Association operate? The optimization of the shareholding structure and the diversified share reform have not yet been launched, and then the neutral name policy has been directly implemented, instead, the clubs using the city name have been forced to promote the government share reform.
Even if the internal logic of the guidelines is completely ignored, regarding unisex names, the program mentions "encouraging clubs that are in a position to do so to progressively de-corporate their names", encouraging, in a position to do so, progressively, where is the justification for a blanket requirement for these terms? (DD)
