Focusing on the wave of anti-corruption in Chinese soccer, the current time is when China's men's soccer team is preparing for the Asian Cup, and the leadership of the Chinese Football Association (CFA) has welcomed new faces. However, the public seems to have put the previous leadership's efforts in the anti-corruption field behind them. But recently, a piece of heavy news has once again ignited the passion of the fans. Li Tie's case has taken a major turn, with some of his confessions reversed, which may affect the final determination of his guilt.
The case has come to an end, Li Tie is facing trial and the case has been transferred to the judiciary. However, the plot has reversed, and Liu Jun, the former chairman of the Chinese Super League Company, has made contradictory statements on the determination of responsibility in the case, and these details are closely linked to Li Tie's case. Now, the focus has shifted to who should be held responsible, Li Tie and Liu Jun, and the relevant agencies will probably re-investigate and take evidence. As a result, Li Tie's sentence may be delayed, which is extremely unfavorable to him.
Li Tie, as the first key suspect to be arrested, confessed to numerous co-defendants after his arrest, implicating them in the fiasco as well. Currently, Li Tie still maintains a relative advantage in the penalty phase, with a chance to obtain leniency by pleading guilty to meritorious charges and voluntarily giving an account of his crimes. However, most of the other suspects insisted on their innocence after their arrest, with the exception of Liu Jun, who denied the crimes identified by Li Tie after his trial.
Law enforcement agencies do not initiate investigations on the basis of personal statements alone, and they will certainly retract and re-examine Li Tie's case only when they discover certain problems. If Liu Jun's statement is corroborated, Li Tie will face more serious charges. First of all, his crime may be even more serious once evidence relating to Li Tie is discovered.
Also suspected of making false confessions was the second suspect. You had claimed that this was Liu Jun's responsibility, but the results of the investigation show that you actually tried to shift the blame to Liu Jun. If the results of this investigation hold up, your previous so-called meritocracy may cease to exist, and the consequences may be far greater than you can imagine.
Liu Jun is the chairman of the Chinese Super League company, while Li Tie controls a Chinese Super League player agent company, some people say that the only way to enter the national team is to join Li Tie's agency, and the relationship between the two sides is intricate. It is worth waiting to see what kind of evidence Liu Jun provides to trigger an investigation by the judiciary. In short, the latest progress of Li Tie's case may once again trigger widespread concern among fans.
