Wow, the national soccer team is really a model of turning the tide against all odds! Under the conditions of no leader supervising the army, no special plane, no bonus, no departure ceremony, the national football team only three-star hotel for accommodation, but under the leadership of Jankovic 2-1 reversal away from home to Thailand, overfulfilled the set target.
The national soccer team has historically been legendary for breaking out in the face of adversity. The more adversity, the more they can stimulate their potential. This time in the battle of Thailand, the outstanding performance of the national football team once again proved this point.
But before the national football team left for Thailand, public opinion was pessimistic. Most of the fans think that the national football team can only draw with the opponent at most, and few people even dare to assert that the national football team can win. Against this backdrop, Guangzhou Evergrande, the eight-time champions of the Chinese Super League, once again became the center of public opinion. Even Jangovic (shown on the right), the current head coach of Qingdao West Coast, demanded that Evergrande take at least half of the responsibility for the current situation of the national soccer team.
Jan Govich's remarks instantly ignited public opinion. One side supports, the other side refutes, the supporters are vigorous, the refuters feel injustice, but also unable to refute.
However, the facts speak for themselves. Jangovic's comments did not have the desired effect, but instead became a laughing stock as the national soccer team beat Thailand on the road.
After the match, the news of the national soccer team's victory once rushed to the top of the hot search list, and another hotspot is Jan Govich's demand for responsibility for Evergrande.
Fans were buzzing in the comments section, arguing that Evergrande was responsible for the national soccer team's performance over Thailand (pictured above). I can't help but laugh at who this is really talking about.
Some fans said, "Evergrande should take at least half of the responsibility for the national soccer team's performance." While some other netizens believe that it would be strange if Evergrande is not responsible for the victory of this game.
These views of the fans are not without merit. After all, Jangovic is on the side of Evergrande. Of course, Evergrande should be responsible when the national soccer team wins, and equally responsible when it loses. There is nothing wrong with such a viewpoint.
These responses are actually a dissatisfaction with Jangovic's accusations, but if we delve deeper, we will find that Evergrande did take some responsibility for the national soccer team's victory.
The first goal came from Wei Shihao's assist, and the second was scored by Wang Shangyuan, both of whom had previously played for Guangzhou Evergrande. In a sense, Evergrande was responsible for half of the victory.
Jangovic said, "Evergrande is at least half responsible for the Chinese national team so far."
Due to the way Guangzhou Evergrande has been criticized for its use of foreign aid, the current domestic local players are not distinctive.
It is true that the domestic local players have not highlighted their individual characteristics, and this trend is correct. But in searching for the cause of the disease, Jangovic has prescribed the wrong medicine according to his own preferences, no wonder this view has caused many fans to be dissatisfied and refute.
Fans with a little common sense in soccer know that a team is only responsible for its own team's signings, playing style, and investments. As for whether other teams follow suit, that is their own independent behavior, Evergrande can not control, stop, and can not be responsible for this.
Today, Jangovic is once again in the spotlight! As a former professional player and current coach, he is supposed to know his way around soccer, yet he makes such brilliant but amateurish statements that are hard to pin down. It is doubtful whether he is speaking out for Chinese soccer, or whether he has another agenda.
